• Edward Andersson Says:

    Hi Tim,

    Great blog on a very important subject. I think that peer led review is a far more constructive way forward compared to centrally controlled and enforced kite marks.

    You mentioned the www.peopleandparticipation.net library as a possible solution. It would be easy to add ratings to the existing and any future resources.

    Interestingly enough our site user group didn't like the idea of user ratings, which they felt would discourage people from posting to the site and create a judgemental atmosphere. I thought I'd throw that into the mix.

    Is there a risk that peer reviews could lead to self-censorship and disengagement amongst those who are less confident in their web 2.0 abilities than others?

    Keep up the good work!

    Edward

  • Reply

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

    More information about formatting options

    Captcha
    This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
    Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

    Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio