Today brings two firsts for this blog. The first ever guest post on the blog. And the first (and possibly only) instance of a post here dedicated to football. So, please welcome Pontus Westerberg from the World Development Movement, introducing this summer’s most essential data driven website…
Who are you going to cheer for in the World Cup? Most people in the UK will probably support England, but what if you’re from Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland and your team didn’t qualify?
Even if your team did qualify, who do you cheer for when they’re not playing? Perhaps a team that plays attractive football, like Brazil or a team that contains players from the club team that you support.
At the World Development Movement we wanted to take this idea a bit further and get people to discuss issues of social injustice, poverty and unfairness that we care a lot about.
The result is the site www.whoshouldicheerfor.com which ranks the countries playing in the World Cup based on a range of development and social justice indicators such as maternal maternity rate, carbon emissions per capita and income inequality.
The statistics for the indicators have mostly been taken from the UN’s Human Development Report and place Ghana as the most supportable team. To get the ‘league table’ we ranked each team for each indicator, then worked out a mean position for each one.
We’ve had some questions about the rankings. ‘Why is Nigeria so high up?’, has been a common one. The answer is that Nigeria has comparatively low carbon emissions and military spending, but also that it is the poorest country playing in the world cup.
That’s right – to highlight the gross inequalities that exist in the world we’ve ranked teams with low GDP per capita higher than teams with high GDP per capita. In our view, the underdogs – teams such as Cote d’Ivoire and Nigeria – from the poorest countries in the World Cup deserve our support more than richer countries.
Of course, the ranking does not represent the official view of WDM on the countries themselves. It’s meant to be a fun and interested way to think hard about serious issues. How come Nigeria is the poorest country in the World Cup, yet has one of the world’s largest oil reserves? Why does the United States – the richest country – give so little money in aid?
So, go ahead, get involved. Who are you going to cheer for?
Unfortunately the WDM site asks you to name the team you are going to cheer for – ironically stifling some of the debate they desire. With a few mates I’ve held to an anti-imperialist and anti-patriotic position at all world cups since 1970, which crudely means we cheer for any team playing England. We have wondered about making this position more sophisticated, but as soon as the national anthem strikes up and Rule Britannia is sung we revert to type. Let it be said we have adopted this position in a jocular and light-hearted manner in many bars across the Mediterranean. However our cheeky irony has not gone down well with England supporters in general.
It would be interesting to see if any youth workers use the WDF model to promote debate. Our republican stance always creates a smashing argument!
Best Wishes
Tony
Oh, just to say my crude ant-imperialism is already in trouble.
England versus the USA!!!
Who on earth am I cheering for!?